Musharraf’s dictatorship spreads to the UK

Last Friday the President of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf was asked to give a lecture at London‘s Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) about Pakistan‘s domestic and regional challenges. The lecture was described as an “embarrassment” by a number of notable British Pakistanis. I was unaware of the extent to which Musharraf had gone to limit the rights of free speech until Friday, when he supposedly downgraded and accused a senior journalist, M.Ziauddin for “casting aspersions” and “undermining our forces and your own country”.

Having heard the speech and the question put forward by Ziauddin, I must say that I do not think that what he asked was unreasonable. The exact exchange was as follows:

MZ: “Ziauddin from Dawn newspaper, Pakistan. You talk very highly of our law and order agency’s skills in the case of Benazir’s I mean it’s for the foreign… (inaudible) …and then you have talked very high(ly) of our custodial control of our nuclear assets but when high profile suspected terrorists like Rashid Rauf give us a slip and escape, then (then) the people here as well as in Pakistan start suspecting of a skills in these matters. Your comments on that please.”

PM: “Yeah sometimes it is people like you who cast such aspersions and reinforce such views. unfortunately. Er, it is…”

MZ (distant voice): “What am I to do about that?”

Chair (clearly): “What is he to do about that?”

PM (speaking to one of his staff in Urdu): “Yeh Ziauddin hai? Huh?” Okay, ya.”

(Rant begins) “Yes, yes indeed. Er, my remark stands. It is, it is, it is, er it is such aspersions that are cast when we highlight such aspersions and bring undermine our own forces, our own Pakistani forces, your Pakistani forces, your country, such things happen everywhere, and if we start casting aspersions that it is the intelligence which has probably left them, and that is how the foreign media also takes it up, and they think that our intelligence is mollified, our armed forces are with the Taleban, this is what happens. Now actually it happened, yes indeed, it is indeed very sad, it is indeed we trying, we are going to try people under court marshall, for anyone who has not looked after this man and allowed him to escape. So this, these things happens, it happens. So what is the issue? Now you are trying to cast aspersions that it is the intelligence and therefore it is all mollified, and therefore and good name of army, I shouldn’t have praised the army, I shouldn’t have praised my intelligence organisation because they are involved in the escape of Rashid Rauf. I don’t think that is true, and please shake these notions away, it is an incident which we need to address.” (End of rant)

Now, from this exchange, you can see that the question posed by Ziauddin was in fact an open question – it asked for Musharraf’s comments on suspicions within the Pakistani community against the law and order agencies, which I assume in this case means the Pakistani intelligence (ISI) – it does not seem like an allegation towards the President himself. Musharraf’s rant however makes him (and the whole incident) come across as very conspicuous to say the least. Some bloggers, journalists and academics have accused Musharraf of insulting Ziauddin during the event by his dismissive remarks. David Blair of the Telegraph writes:

“As soon as Ziauddin, the Islamabad editor of Dawn, a Pakistani daily, rose to ask his question, Musharraf visibly bristled. Instantly, his demeanour changed from being relaxed and confident to tense and hostile … (his) disgraceful response to an entirely reasonable query spoke volumes about Musharraf. He will question the patriotism of any Pakistani critic – betraying his essential intolerance of dissent. I wonder whether Musharraf would have responded with such rage had a British journalist asked precisely the same question? I suspect he would have answered firmly but politely. Musharraf treats his fellow Pakistanis with contempt while oozing charm for the benefit of foreigners.”

But this has not been the only report about the incident which took place on Friday. Speaking to a senior acquaintance earlier today I came to learn that after the event Musharraf was well and truly frazzled by Ziauddin’s question, palpitating and swearing about the journalist, and throwing around remarks such as “he must be dealt with” and inciting British Pakistani’s to “beat up Ziauddin”. Insiders also claim that Musharraf’s cronies (including Commerce Minister, Akhtar Khan) are now “losing even the shred of respect they had for him after insulting such a senior academic and journalist.” I decided to check other sources to back up this story, and I found a few other shocking statements from people who were with Musharraf in the moments following this lecture.

Musharraf’s dictatorship no longer limits itself to Pakistan, but has now spread it’s wings to the West, he is now freer than ever to incite others and openly threaten anyone he believes is being unpatriotic (against his regime). In Britain, we are given the liberty to speak freely, we are able to question and criticise our country for what we believe is right or wrong. Musharraf says that he believes in democracy, and a society that is equal and just. But where, I ask, is the freedom and justice in this?

[Added 29 January 2008]:

Not surprisingly, Musharraf’s irrational approach to this incident has now provoked questions from Gordon Brown at No.10 earlier today and a media investigation (I use the term intentionally) into the disappearance of Rashid Rauf. Today, the Guardian published a two-page spread on the missing person and raises questions about the involvement of the Pakistani intelligence.

I would love to know the President’s reaction.

Advertisements

8 Comments

  1. mush is a dictator, what else can we expect from him ??

  2. Yes, alhamdulillah, Musharraf is a true patriot. Pakistan is above everything. God bless Musharraf and our motherland. Allah has blessed us. Alhamdulillahi Rabil ‘Alamaeen.

  3. A true patriot is the one who stands up for his countrymen with courage in the face of injustice and corruption – not a tyrannical autocrat who dismisses anyone for speaking up against his undemocratic regime. Pakistan is for the people, not for a selected few such as the elite / military personnel.

  4. i m very shocked what kind of words using pakistani president b mature mr mushraf control yourself its democrecy pls dont use loose talks. in uk at there real democrat country

  5. I am not very much fond of Musharraf and his policies BUT as a Pakistani I believe Musharraf’s remarks for Mr. Ziauddin stands right. Escape incident of criminals happens everywhere… but no real patriot would mortify his/her own country by casting such incidents as complete failure of intelligence and low enforcement agencies. I guess we are losing the sense of nationalism…

    http://www.ahmedquraishi.com/latest_col.php?id=12

  6. Mush is far from being a partiout. What do you call a man who gets his fellow ctizens bombed and shot without any trial. One who stands dby and watches the gangs plunder the city and raid people’s houses to loot the house and rape girls. I find no logic in calling such a man a human being, let alone a patriot. For those who support mush i ask you this: Is a man who sells his nation in fear of an attack from a superior force a partiot or a coward? If he is a partiot and a great person (like some think), what will you call people like William Wallace (Braveheart), or the companions of Muhammed (peace be upon him) who stood up against forces greater in numbers and better equipped? Take your pick. Common sense says the one who stands for what is right is brave and the other is a coward. I for one believe that mush would have been a patriot if he had refused to join america’s war on terror (read war on non-seculars) and had said that pakistanis are ready to protect themselves from any foreign threat.

    As Wallace said: They may take our lives, but they will never take our freedom. Sadly our freedom was taken days after 9/11 and our (muslims) lives are being taken too.

  7. Hameed I am confused by your comment – I didn’t understand the last bit about the UK’s democracy. In the UK citizens are given the freedom to criticise and challenge their government – the administration that is chosen through a democratic process; through elections – through free-will. I am not saying that democracy works everywhere and in some nations democracy may not be the right answer for liberty and human rights, but in the case of Pakistan I have seen a history of military rule as well as civilian governments which were apparently “democractically elected” but none of them were truly representative of the people. It is time for a real step change in Pakistani politics, time for the people to stand up for what they believe in and against people like Musharraf AND the minority elite who run the country.

    M.Ziauddin questioned Musharraf on an issue in the UK which was relevant to the British people – it was about Rashid Rauf a British citizen – the question asked was one of the most relevant ones asked. I am not sure if you have heard the Q&A but I urge you to listen to it: http://www.rusi.org, all will become clear. Ziauddin was well within his rights as a journalist (with the changing nature of media now, journalists are in a position to object and challenge – will the common folk ever get the chance? I think not) Musharraf has full opportunity to clear the mix-up and set the record straight, but instead he plunged into a discussion about patriotism and loyalty which was totally beyond the point. THIS is the problem with Pakistanis (I am generalising here) – they are so obsessed with patriotism and nationalism that they are happy to see their country being sold to America (foreign aid post 9/11) and sing “dil dil pakistan” on 14 August but they will not stand up for their country.

    It is a shame really!

    Another article which I found very interesting was this: http://rememberjenkinsear.blogspot.com/2008/01/overview-of-pakistans-development.html

  8. What do you a situation where a countries law enforcement fail to detect 5000 jihadis moving to take over a major communications artery, surrender at sight of millitants approaching their convoy, allow a convoy taking arms and ammunitions to be taken by said millitants, allow a group of people – who threaten suicide bombings against the country – to propagate their ideology within sight of the countries premier intelligence agency. We can only refer to this as a failure of the government to act. Most countries have an army to protect its borders the Pakistan Army unfortunately is good for little other than to conquer its own people on a regular basis. I would highly recomend Military inc by Ayesha Sidiqa for a start towards understanding the problem.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s